Add SportsStats to your home screen

Los Angeles Dodgers logo

Los Angeles Dodgers

LAD · NL West · 2026
See the full league board →

Roster construction

Metric Value Lg avg Diff Rank Percentile
Plate appearances given to sub-replacement hitters 53 736 −683 2nd of 30
Share of plate appearances given to sub-replacement hitters 1.2% 16.2% −15.1% 2nd of 30
WAR bled by sub-replacement hitters -0.6 -2.4 +1.8 4th of 30
Count of sub-replacement hitters 2 5 −3 3rd of 30
Batters faced by sub-replacement pitchers 767 805 −38 18th of 30
Share of batters faced by sub-replacement pitchers 16.2% 17.4% −1.3% 18th of 30
WAR of the club's best position player 3.7 3.7 13th of 30
Combined WAR of the club's three best position players 10.5 8.4 +2.1 4th of 30
Combined WAR of the club's five best position players 15.2 11.7 +3.5 3rd of 30
Total position-player WAR 22.2 13.9 +8.3 2nd of 30
Total pitching WAR 17.6 10.5 +7.1 2nd of 30
Share of position-player WAR from the top three 47.3% 63.7% −16.4% 29th of 30
Concentration of WAR across the lineup 0.42 0.41 +0.01 15th of 30
Position players with a 2+ WAR season 4 2 +1 4th of 30
Position players with a 4+ WAR season 0 0 12th of 30
Hitters used 21 21 17th of 30
Plate-appearance-weighted batting age 31.3 28.4 +2.9 1st of 30
Plate appearances given to hitters 25 and under 468 1035 −567 27th of 30
Share of plate appearances given to hitters 25 and under 10.2% 22.8% −12.6% 27th of 30
Plate appearances given to hitters 35 and older 1076 288 +787 1st of 30

Staff shape

Metric Value Lg avg Diff Rank Percentile
Pitchers used 29 27 +1 9th of 30
Rotation WAR 15.9 9.2 +6.7 1st of 30
Bullpen WAR 5.8 3.6 +2.2 4th of 30
Combined WAR of the club's three best starters 9.1 6.7 +2.4 3rd of 30
Share of innings thrown by starters 81.5% 70.4% +11.0% 2nd of 30
Quality starts 69 40 +28 1st of 30
Blown saves 13 18 −5 5th of 30

Results

Metric Value Lg avg Diff Rank Percentile
Run differential 140 0 +140 2nd of 30
Run differential per game 1.22 0.00 +1.22 2nd of 30
Runs scored per game 5.08 4.49 +0.59 3rd of 30
Runs allowed per game 3.86 4.49 −0.63 4th of 30
Winning percentage .600 .500 +.100 3rd of 30
Pythagorean winning percentage .623 .501 +.122 2nd of 30
Wins above Pythagorean expectation -2.6 -0.1 −2.5 23rd of 30
Winning percentage in one-run games .556 .500 +.056 7th of 30
Winning percentage in games decided by five or more .659 .498 +.161 3rd of 30
Winning percentage in extra innings 1.000 .515 +.485 1st of 30
Home winning percentage .589 .524 +.065 7th of 30
Road winning percentage .610 .476 +.134 2nd of 30
Winning percentage within the division .595 .500 +.095 7th of 30
Longest winning streak 6 6 10th of 30

Batting

Metric Value Lg avg Diff Rank Percentile
Team Games 115 115 15th of 30
Team Plate Appearances 4408 4365 +42 6th of 30
Team At Bats 3880 3878 +1 15th of 30
Team Runs 584 518 +65 4th of 30
Team Hits 1017 945 +71 2nd of 30
Team Doubles 189 179 +9 10th of 30
Team Triples 11 15 −4 20th of 30
Team Home Runs 149 133 +15 6th of 30
Team Runs Batted In 549 495 +53 4th of 30
Team Stolen Bases 44 78 −34 28th of 30
Team Walks 433 388 +44 4th of 30
Team Strikeouts 903 966 −63 6th of 30
Team Walk Rate 9.8% 8.9% +0.9% 4th of 30
Team Strikeout Rate 20.5% 22.1% −1.6% 4th of 30
Team Batting Average .262 .244 +.018 1st of 30
Team On-Base Percentage .339 .318 +.021 1st of 30
Team Slugging Percentage .432 .401 +.031 2nd of 30
Team On-Base Plus Slugging .771 .720 +.051 1st of 30

Pitching

Metric Value Lg avg Diff Rank Percentile
Team Wins 69 57 +11 3rd of 30
Team Losses 46 57 −11 3rd of 30
Team Saves 30 29 14th of 30
Team Games 115 115 15th of 30
Team Games Started 115 115 15th of 30
Team Innings Pitched 1014.1 1023.0 −8.2 26th of 30
Team Innings per Game 8.8 8.9 −0.1 20th of 30
Team Strikeouts 1025 966 +58 8th of 30
Team Strikeouts per 9 Innings 9.1 8.5 +0.6 5th of 30
Team Walks per 9 Innings 3.1 3.4 −0.3 8th of 30
Team Earned Run Average 3.74 4.18 −0.44 6th of 30

Rank is among the MLB clubs with a value for that metric, best first. Descriptive metrics (roster age, WAR concentration) are ranked but not colored — for them, "high" isn't "good".