Worcester Red Sox
WOR · International League International League East · 2026Roster construction
| Metric | Value | Lg avg | Diff | Rank | Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hitters used | 27 | 31 | −4 | 26th of 30 |
|
| Plate-appearance-weighted batting age | 27.2 | 26.9 | +0.3 | 11th of 30 |
|
| Plate appearances given to hitters 25 and under | 1989 | 2062 | −73 | 17th of 30 |
|
| Share of plate appearances given to hitters 25 and under | 34.0% | 34.9% | −0.9% | 15th of 30 |
|
| Plate appearances given to hitters 35 and older | 0 | 102 | −102 | 17th of 30 |
|
Staff shape
| Metric | Value | Lg avg | Diff | Rank | Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pitchers used | 46 | 44 | +1 | 11th of 30 |
|
| Share of innings thrown by starters | 68.3% | 73.4% | −5.1% | 24th of 30 |
|
| Blown saves | 27 | 26 | — | 16th of 30 |
|
Results
| Metric | Value | Lg avg | Diff | Rank | Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Run differential | 56 | 0 | +56 | 8th of 30 |
|
| Run differential per game | 0.41 | 0.00 | +0.41 | 8th of 30 |
|
| Runs scored per game | 5.29 | 5.33 | −0.04 | 15th of 30 |
|
| Runs allowed per game | 4.88 | 5.33 | −0.45 | 8th of 30 |
|
| Winning percentage | .529 | .500 | +.029 | 11th of 30 |
|
| Pythagorean winning percentage | .536 | .501 | +.035 | 8th of 30 |
|
| Wins above Pythagorean expectation | -1.0 | -0.1 | −0.9 | 15th of 30 |
|
| Winning percentage in one-run games | .513 | .502 | +.011 | 13th of 30 |
|
| Winning percentage in games decided by five or more | .525 | .502 | +.023 | 13th of 30 |
|
| Winning percentage in extra innings | .571 | .507 | +.064 | 10th of 30 |
|
| Home winning percentage | .552 | .517 | +.035 | 12th of 30 |
|
| Road winning percentage | .507 | .483 | +.024 | 10th of 30 |
|
| Winning percentage within the division | .539 | .501 | +.038 | 11th of 30 |
|
| Longest winning streak | 6 | 6 | — | 13th of 30 |
|
Rank is among the AAA clubs with a value for that metric, best first. Descriptive metrics (roster age, WAR concentration) are ranked but not colored — for them, "high" isn't "good".