Scranton/WB RailRiders
SWB · International League International League East · 2026Roster construction
| Metric | Value | Lg avg | Diff | Rank | Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hitters used | 25 | 27 | −2 | 24th of 30 |
|
| Plate-appearance-weighted batting age | 26.8 | 26.9 | −0.1 | 16th of 30 |
|
| Plate appearances given to hitters 25 and under | 1339 | 1542 | −203 | 21st of 30 |
|
| Share of plate appearances given to hitters 25 and under | 33.0% | 34.9% | −1.9% | 16th of 30 |
|
| Plate appearances given to hitters 35 and older | 240 | 78 | +161 | 4th of 30 |
|
Staff shape
| Metric | Value | Lg avg | Diff | Rank | Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pitchers used | 30 | 37 | −7 | 28th of 30 |
|
| Share of innings thrown by starters | 74.7% | 71.8% | +2.9% | 10th of 30 |
|
| Blown saves | 19 | 19 | — | 16th of 30 |
|
Results
| Metric | Value | Lg avg | Diff | Rank | Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Run differential | 67 | 0 | +67 | 4th of 30 |
|
| Run differential per game | 0.63 | 0.00 | +0.63 | 4th of 30 |
|
| Runs scored per game | 5.24 | 5.42 | −0.18 | 17th of 30 |
|
| Runs allowed per game | 4.62 | 5.41 | −0.79 | 2nd of 30 |
|
| Winning percentage | .561 | .500 | +.061 | 5th of 30 |
|
| Pythagorean winning percentage | .558 | .501 | +.057 | 4th of 30 |
|
| Wins above Pythagorean expectation | 0.3 | -0.1 | +0.4 | 14th of 30 |
|
| Winning percentage in one-run games | .629 | .503 | +.126 | 2nd of 30 |
|
| Winning percentage in games decided by five or more | .581 | .500 | +.081 | 7th of 30 |
|
| Winning percentage in extra innings | .500 | .505 | −.005 | 16th of 30 |
|
| Home winning percentage | .569 | .519 | +.050 | 10th of 30 |
|
| Road winning percentage | .554 | .480 | +.074 | 4th of 30 |
|
| Winning percentage within the division | .539 | .502 | +.037 | 11th of 30 |
|
| Longest winning streak | 8 | 5 | +2 | 3rd of 30 |
|
Rank is among the AAA clubs with a value for that metric, best first. Descriptive metrics (roster age, WAR concentration) are ranked but not colored — for them, "high" isn't "good".