Palm Beach Cardinals
PMB · Florida State League Florida State League East · 2026Roster construction
| Metric | Value | Lg avg | Diff | Rank | Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hitters used | 35 | 31 | +3 | 7th of 30 |
|
| Plate-appearance-weighted batting age | 21.4 | 21.3 | +0.1 | 14th of 30 |
|
| Plate appearances given to hitters 25 and under | 4816 | 4664 | +151 | 6th of 30 |
|
| Share of plate appearances given to hitters 25 and under | 99.9% | 99.1% | +0.8% | 15th of 30 |
|
| Plate appearances given to hitters 35 and older | 0 | 1 | −1 | 3rd of 30 |
|
Staff shape
| Metric | Value | Lg avg | Diff | Rank | Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pitchers used | 53 | 41 | +11 | 6th of 30 |
|
| Share of innings thrown by starters | 63.2% | 64.3% | −1.1% | 18th of 30 |
|
| Blown saves | 12 | 18 | −6 | 3rd of 30 |
|
Results
| Metric | Value | Lg avg | Diff | Rank | Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Run differential | 20 | 0 | +20 | 14th of 30 |
|
| Run differential per game | 0.17 | 0.00 | +0.17 | 14th of 30 |
|
| Runs scored per game | 5.64 | 5.57 | +0.07 | 11th of 30 |
|
| Runs allowed per game | 5.48 | 5.57 | −0.09 | 15th of 30 |
|
| Winning percentage | .496 | .500 | −.004 | 17th of 30 |
|
| Pythagorean winning percentage | .514 | .502 | +.012 | 14th of 30 |
|
| Wins above Pythagorean expectation | -2.2 | -0.2 | −2.0 | 22nd of 30 |
|
| Winning percentage in one-run games | .353 | .496 | −.143 | 28th of 30 |
|
| Winning percentage in games decided by five or more | .465 | .502 | −.036 | 19th of 30 |
|
| Winning percentage in extra innings | .400 | .470 | −.070 | 17th of 30 |
|
| Home winning percentage | .533 | .532 | +.002 | 16th of 30 |
|
| Road winning percentage | .459 | .469 | −.010 | 18th of 30 |
|
| Winning percentage within the division | .439 | .500 | −.061 | 22nd of 30 |
|
| Longest winning streak | 8 | 6 | +1 | 4th of 30 |
|
Rank is among the A clubs with a value for that metric, best first. Descriptive metrics (roster age, WAR concentration) are ranked but not colored — for them, "high" isn't "good".