Omaha Storm Chasers
OMA · International League International League West · 2026Roster construction
| Metric | Value | Lg avg | Diff | Rank | Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hitters used | 28 | 27 | — | 11th of 30 |
|
| Plate-appearance-weighted batting age | 28.7 | 26.9 | +1.8 | 3rd of 30 |
|
| Plate appearances given to hitters 25 and under | 680 | 1485 | −805 | 26th of 30 |
|
| Share of plate appearances given to hitters 25 and under | 15.4% | 34.6% | −19.2% | 26th of 30 |
|
| Plate appearances given to hitters 35 and older | 140 | 77 | +62 | 10th of 30 |
|
Staff shape
| Metric | Value | Lg avg | Diff | Rank | Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pitchers used | 40 | 37 | +2 | 7th of 30 |
|
| Share of innings thrown by starters | 66.2% | 71.9% | −5.8% | 24th of 30 |
|
| Blown saves | 32 | 18 | +13 | 30th of 30 |
|
Results
| Metric | Value | Lg avg | Diff | Rank | Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Run differential | -60 | 0 | −60 | 25th of 30 |
|
| Run differential per game | -0.56 | 0.00 | −0.56 | 25th of 30 |
|
| Runs scored per game | 5.22 | 5.42 | −0.20 | 19th of 30 |
|
| Runs allowed per game | 5.78 | 5.42 | +0.36 | 23rd of 30 |
|
| Winning percentage | .472 | .500 | −.028 | 20th of 30 |
|
| Pythagorean winning percentage | .454 | .501 | −.047 | 25th of 30 |
|
| Wins above Pythagorean expectation | 2.0 | -0.1 | +2.1 | 10th of 30 |
|
| Winning percentage in one-run games | .345 | .504 | −.158 | 29th of 30 |
|
| Winning percentage in games decided by five or more | .469 | .500 | −.031 | 19th of 30 |
|
| Winning percentage in extra innings | .200 | .505 | −.305 | 28th of 30 |
|
| Home winning percentage | .491 | .520 | −.029 | 22nd of 30 |
|
| Road winning percentage | .451 | .480 | −.029 | 18th of 30 |
|
| Winning percentage within the division | .425 | .502 | −.077 | 26th of 30 |
|
| Longest winning streak | 8 | 5 | +2 | 3rd of 30 |
|
Rank is among the AAA clubs with a value for that metric, best first. Descriptive metrics (roster age, WAR concentration) are ranked but not colored — for them, "high" isn't "good".