Las Vegas Aviators
LV · Pacific Coast League Pacific Coast League West · 2026Roster construction
| Metric | Value | Lg avg | Diff | Rank | Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hitters used | 33 | 31 | +1 | 10th of 30 |
|
| Plate-appearance-weighted batting age | 27.2 | 26.9 | +0.3 | 14th of 30 |
|
| Plate appearances given to hitters 25 and under | 2356 | 2062 | +293 | 10th of 30 |
|
| Share of plate appearances given to hitters 25 and under | 36.7% | 34.9% | +1.8% | 13th of 30 |
|
| Plate appearances given to hitters 35 and older | 147 | 102 | +44 | 10th of 30 |
|
Staff shape
| Metric | Value | Lg avg | Diff | Rank | Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pitchers used | 44 | 44 | — | 15th of 30 |
|
| Share of innings thrown by starters | 66.8% | 73.4% | −6.6% | 27th of 30 |
|
| Blown saves | 22 | 26 | −4 | 11th of 30 |
|
Results
| Metric | Value | Lg avg | Diff | Rank | Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Run differential | 50 | 0 | +50 | 8th of 30 |
|
| Run differential per game | 0.35 | 0.00 | +0.35 | 9th of 30 |
|
| Runs scored per game | 6.51 | 5.33 | +1.18 | 1st of 30 |
|
| Runs allowed per game | 6.16 | 5.33 | +0.83 | 26th of 30 |
|
| Winning percentage | .585 | .500 | +.085 | 3rd of 30 |
|
| Pythagorean winning percentage | .525 | .501 | +.024 | 10th of 30 |
|
| Wins above Pythagorean expectation | 8.5 | -0.1 | +8.6 | 1st of 30 |
|
| Winning percentage in one-run games | .692 | .502 | +.190 | 1st of 30 |
|
| Winning percentage in games decided by five or more | .510 | .502 | +.008 | 16th of 30 |
|
| Winning percentage in extra innings | .875 | .507 | +.368 | 1st of 30 |
|
| Home winning percentage | .560 | .518 | +.042 | 10th of 30 |
|
| Road winning percentage | .612 | .483 | +.129 | 1st of 30 |
|
| Winning percentage within the division | .620 | .501 | +.119 | 2nd of 30 |
|
| Longest winning streak | 7 | 6 | — | 6th of 30 |
|
Rank is among the AAA clubs with a value for that metric, best first. Descriptive metrics (roster age, WAR concentration) are ranked but not colored — for them, "high" isn't "good".