Lakeland Flying Tigers
LAK · Florida State League Florida State League West · 2026Roster construction
| Metric | Value | Lg avg | Diff | Rank | Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hitters used | 34 | 29 | +4 | 6th of 30 |
|
| Plate-appearance-weighted batting age | 21.8 | 21.3 | +0.5 | 6th of 30 |
|
| Plate appearances given to hitters 25 and under | 3969 | 4083 | −114 | 22nd of 30 |
|
| Share of plate appearances given to hitters 25 and under | 98.8% | 99.1% | −0.3% | 24th of 30 |
|
| Plate appearances given to hitters 35 and older | 0 | 1 | −1 | 3rd of 30 |
|
Staff shape
| Metric | Value | Lg avg | Diff | Rank | Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pitchers used | 54 | 37 | +16 | 3rd of 30 |
|
| Share of innings thrown by starters | 49.1% | 64.0% | −14.8% | 30th of 30 |
|
| Blown saves | 22 | 16 | +5 | 24th of 30 |
|
Results
| Metric | Value | Lg avg | Diff | Rank | Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Run differential | 5 | 0 | +5 | 16th of 30 |
|
| Run differential per game | 0.05 | 0.00 | +0.05 | 16th of 30 |
|
| Runs scored per game | 5.38 | 5.57 | −0.19 | 20th of 30 |
|
| Runs allowed per game | 5.33 | 5.57 | −0.24 | 10th of 30 |
|
| Winning percentage | .467 | .500 | −.033 | 20th of 30 |
|
| Pythagorean winning percentage | .504 | .502 | +.002 | 16th of 30 |
|
| Wins above Pythagorean expectation | -3.9 | -0.2 | −3.7 | 29th of 30 |
|
| Winning percentage in one-run games | .348 | .497 | −.149 | 28th of 30 |
|
| Winning percentage in games decided by five or more | .590 | .504 | +.086 | 7th of 30 |
|
| Winning percentage in extra innings | .000 | .476 | −.476 | 29th of 30 |
|
| Home winning percentage | .510 | .526 | −.016 | 17th of 30 |
|
| Road winning percentage | .426 | .475 | −.049 | 22nd of 30 |
|
| Winning percentage within the division | .464 | .500 | −.036 | 20th of 30 |
|
| Longest winning streak | 7 | 6 | — | 8th of 30 |
|
Rank is among the A clubs with a value for that metric, best first. Descriptive metrics (roster age, WAR concentration) are ranked but not colored — for them, "high" isn't "good".