Jersey Shore BlueClaws
JS · South Atlantic League South Atlantic League North · 2026Roster construction
| Metric | Value | Lg avg | Diff | Rank | Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hitters used | 40 | 28 | +11 | 1st of 30 |
|
| Plate-appearance-weighted batting age | 23.6 | 22.7 | +0.9 | 1st of 30 |
|
| Plate appearances given to hitters 25 and under | 4133 | 4787 | −654 | 29th of 30 |
|
| Share of plate appearances given to hitters 25 and under | 86.1% | 94.8% | −8.7% | 28th of 30 |
|
| Plate appearances given to hitters 35 and older | 0 | 0 | — | 1st of 30 |
|
Staff shape
| Metric | Value | Lg avg | Diff | Rank | Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pitchers used | 38 | 36 | +1 | 11th of 30 |
|
| Share of innings thrown by starters | 67.3% | 64.7% | +2.6% | 10th of 30 |
|
| Blown saves | 16 | 20 | −4 | 2nd of 30 |
|
Results
| Metric | Value | Lg avg | Diff | Rank | Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Run differential | -134 | 0 | −134 | 26th of 30 |
|
| Run differential per game | -1.06 | 0.00 | −1.06 | 26th of 30 |
|
| Runs scored per game | 4.20 | 5.56 | −1.36 | 30th of 30 |
|
| Runs allowed per game | 5.26 | 5.55 | −0.29 | 10th of 30 |
|
| Winning percentage | .354 | .500 | −.146 | 29th of 30 |
|
| Pythagorean winning percentage | .399 | .501 | −.102 | 26th of 30 |
|
| Wins above Pythagorean expectation | -5.7 | -0.1 | −5.6 | 28th of 30 |
|
| Winning percentage in one-run games | .421 | .498 | −.077 | 23rd of 30 |
|
| Winning percentage in games decided by five or more | .359 | .501 | −.142 | 26th of 30 |
|
| Winning percentage in extra innings | .429 | .512 | −.083 | 18th of 30 |
|
| Home winning percentage | .344 | .520 | −.176 | 30th of 30 |
|
| Road winning percentage | .365 | .481 | −.116 | 26th of 30 |
|
| Winning percentage within the division | .360 | .509 | −.149 | 28th of 30 |
|
| Longest winning streak | 4 | 6 | −2 | 30th of 30 |
|
Rank is among the A+ clubs with a value for that metric, best first. Descriptive metrics (roster age, WAR concentration) are ranked but not colored — for them, "high" isn't "good".