Inland Empire 66ers
IE · California League California League South · 2026Roster construction
| Metric | Value | Lg avg | Diff | Rank | Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hitters used | 23 | 30 | −7 | 25th of 30 |
|
| Plate-appearance-weighted batting age | 23.0 | 21.3 | +1.7 | 1st of 30 |
|
| Plate appearances given to hitters 25 and under | 4483 | 4433 | +49 | 10th of 30 |
|
| Share of plate appearances given to hitters 25 and under | 99.3% | 99.1% | +0.2% | 21st of 30 |
|
| Plate appearances given to hitters 35 and older | 0 | 1 | −1 | 3rd of 30 |
|
Staff shape
| Metric | Value | Lg avg | Diff | Rank | Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pitchers used | 34 | 39 | −5 | 19th of 30 |
|
| Share of innings thrown by starters | 58.0% | 64.2% | −6.2% | 23rd of 30 |
|
| Blown saves | 21 | 17 | +3 | 20th of 30 |
|
Results
| Metric | Value | Lg avg | Diff | Rank | Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Run differential | -10 | 0 | −10 | 18th of 30 |
|
| Run differential per game | -0.09 | 0.00 | −0.09 | 18th of 30 |
|
| Runs scored per game | 5.58 | 5.57 | +0.01 | 13th of 30 |
|
| Runs allowed per game | 5.67 | 5.57 | +0.10 | 20th of 30 |
|
| Winning percentage | .470 | .500 | −.030 | 22nd of 30 |
|
| Pythagorean winning percentage | .493 | .502 | −.008 | 17th of 30 |
|
| Wins above Pythagorean expectation | -2.7 | -0.2 | −2.5 | 24th of 30 |
|
| Winning percentage in one-run games | .367 | .498 | −.130 | 26th of 30 |
|
| Winning percentage in games decided by five or more | .432 | .502 | −.070 | 23rd of 30 |
|
| Winning percentage in extra innings | .167 | .479 | −.312 | 27th of 30 |
|
| Home winning percentage | .483 | .532 | −.048 | 23rd of 30 |
|
| Road winning percentage | .455 | .469 | −.014 | 19th of 30 |
|
| Winning percentage within the division | .426 | .500 | −.074 | 25th of 30 |
|
| Longest winning streak | 5 | 6 | −1 | 19th of 30 |
|
Rank is among the A clubs with a value for that metric, best first. Descriptive metrics (roster age, WAR concentration) are ranked but not colored — for them, "high" isn't "good".