DSL Reds
D-RED · Dominican Summer League Dominican Summer League West · 2026Roster construction
| Metric | Value | Lg avg | Diff | Rank | Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hitters used | 18 | 20 | −2 | 44th of 81 |
|
| Plate-appearance-weighted batting age | 18.4 | 18.9 | −0.5 | 43rd of 81 |
|
| Plate appearances given to hitters 25 and under | 2389 | 2137 | +251 | 13th of 81 |
|
| Share of plate appearances given to hitters 25 and under | 100.0% | 99.2% | +0.8% | 1st of 81 |
|
| Plate appearances given to hitters 35 and older | 0 | 0 | — | 4th of 81 |
|
Staff shape
| Metric | Value | Lg avg | Diff | Rank | Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pitchers used | 24 | 26 | −2 | 47th of 81 |
|
| Share of innings thrown by starters | 62.3% | 63.4% | −1.1% | 44th of 81 |
|
| Blown saves | 8 | 10 | −2 | 20th of 81 |
|
Results
| Metric | Value | Lg avg | Diff | Rank | Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Run differential | 102 | 0 | +102 | 10th of 81 |
|
| Run differential per game | 1.85 | -0.00 | +1.85 | 11th of 81 |
|
| Runs scored per game | 7.22 | 6.20 | +1.02 | 12th of 81 |
|
| Runs allowed per game | 5.36 | 6.20 | −0.84 | 26th of 81 |
|
| Winning percentage | .655 | .500 | +.155 | 7th of 81 |
|
| Pythagorean winning percentage | .633 | .503 | +.130 | 12th of 81 |
|
| Wins above Pythagorean expectation | 1.2 | -0.2 | +1.4 | 22nd of 81 |
|
| Winning percentage in one-run games | .429 | .496 | −.066 | 56th of 81 |
|
| Winning percentage in games decided by five or more | .684 | .500 | +.184 | 16th of 81 |
|
| Winning percentage in extra innings | .500 | .525 | −.025 | 30th of 61 |
|
| Home winning percentage | .778 | .557 | +.221 | 1st of 81 |
|
| Road winning percentage | .536 | .443 | +.093 | 24th of 81 |
|
| Winning percentage within the division | .710 | .501 | +.209 | 5th of 81 |
|
| Longest winning streak | 8 | 5 | +2 | 10th of 81 |
|
Rank is among the Rk clubs with a value for that metric, best first. Descriptive metrics (roster age, WAR concentration) are ranked but not colored — for them, "high" isn't "good".