DSL Pirates Gold
D-PIG · Dominican Summer League Dominican Summer League Central · 2026Roster construction
| Metric | Value | Lg avg | Diff | Rank | Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hitters used | 22 | 20 | +1 | 26th of 81 |
|
| Plate-appearance-weighted batting age | 18.0 | 18.9 | −0.9 | 63rd of 81 |
|
| Plate appearances given to hitters 25 and under | 2307 | 2137 | +169 | 18th of 81 |
|
| Share of plate appearances given to hitters 25 and under | 100.0% | 99.2% | +0.8% | 1st of 81 |
|
| Plate appearances given to hitters 35 and older | 0 | 0 | — | 4th of 81 |
|
Staff shape
| Metric | Value | Lg avg | Diff | Rank | Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pitchers used | 28 | 26 | +1 | 29th of 81 |
|
| Share of innings thrown by starters | 61.7% | 63.4% | −1.7% | 46th of 81 |
|
| Blown saves | 13 | 10 | +2 | 62nd of 81 |
|
Results
| Metric | Value | Lg avg | Diff | Rank | Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Run differential | -8 | 0 | −8 | 47th of 81 |
|
| Run differential per game | -0.15 | -0.00 | −0.15 | 47th of 81 |
|
| Runs scored per game | 6.29 | 6.20 | +0.09 | 36th of 81 |
|
| Runs allowed per game | 6.44 | 6.20 | +0.24 | 47th of 81 |
|
| Winning percentage | .400 | .500 | −.100 | 62nd of 81 |
|
| Pythagorean winning percentage | .490 | .503 | −.013 | 47th of 81 |
|
| Wins above Pythagorean expectation | -4.9 | -0.2 | −4.7 | 78th of 81 |
|
| Winning percentage in one-run games | .300 | .496 | −.196 | 76th of 81 |
|
| Winning percentage in games decided by five or more | .480 | .500 | −.020 | 44th of 81 |
|
| Winning percentage in extra innings | 1.000 | .525 | +.475 | 1st of 61 |
|
| Home winning percentage | .536 | .557 | −.021 | 45th of 81 |
|
| Road winning percentage | .259 | .443 | −.184 | 69th of 81 |
|
| Winning percentage within the division | .290 | .501 | −.211 | 73rd of 81 |
|
| Longest winning streak | 4 | 5 | −1 | 47th of 81 |
|
Rank is among the Rk clubs with a value for that metric, best first. Descriptive metrics (roster age, WAR concentration) are ranked but not colored — for them, "high" isn't "good".