DSL Mariners
D-MRN · Dominican Summer League Dominican Summer League Southwest · 2026Roster construction
| Metric | Value | Lg avg | Diff | Rank | Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hitters used | 16 | 20 | −4 | 56th of 81 |
|
| Plate-appearance-weighted batting age | 18.2 | 18.9 | −0.6 | 50th of 81 |
|
| Plate appearances given to hitters 25 and under | 2093 | 2137 | −44 | 39th of 81 |
|
| Share of plate appearances given to hitters 25 and under | 100.0% | 99.2% | +0.8% | 1st of 81 |
|
| Plate appearances given to hitters 35 and older | 0 | 0 | — | 4th of 81 |
|
Staff shape
| Metric | Value | Lg avg | Diff | Rank | Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pitchers used | 21 | 26 | −5 | 62nd of 81 |
|
| Share of innings thrown by starters | 58.4% | 63.4% | −5.0% | 60th of 81 |
|
| Blown saves | 17 | 10 | +6 | 79th of 81 |
|
Results
| Metric | Value | Lg avg | Diff | Rank | Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Run differential | 59 | 0 | +59 | 20th of 81 |
|
| Run differential per game | 1.05 | -0.00 | +1.05 | 20th of 81 |
|
| Runs scored per game | 6.84 | 6.20 | +0.64 | 23rd of 81 |
|
| Runs allowed per game | 5.79 | 6.20 | −0.41 | 36th of 81 |
|
| Winning percentage | .589 | .500 | +.089 | 24th of 81 |
|
| Pythagorean winning percentage | .576 | .503 | +.073 | 22nd of 81 |
|
| Wins above Pythagorean expectation | 0.7 | -0.2 | +0.9 | 29th of 81 |
|
| Winning percentage in one-run games | .522 | .496 | +.026 | 35th of 81 |
|
| Winning percentage in games decided by five or more | .667 | .501 | +.166 | 18th of 81 |
|
| Winning percentage in extra innings | .250 | .525 | −.275 | 39th of 61 |
|
| Home winning percentage | .679 | .557 | +.122 | 13th of 81 |
|
| Road winning percentage | .500 | .443 | +.057 | 29th of 81 |
|
| Winning percentage within the division | .531 | .501 | +.030 | 39th of 81 |
|
| Longest winning streak | 5 | 5 | — | 29th of 81 |
|
Rank is among the Rk clubs with a value for that metric, best first. Descriptive metrics (roster age, WAR concentration) are ranked but not colored — for them, "high" isn't "good".