DSL CLE Goryl
D-CLG · Dominican Summer League Dominican Summer League Central · 2026Roster construction
| Metric | Value | Lg avg | Diff | Rank | Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hitters used | 17 | 20 | −3 | 48th of 81 |
|
| Plate-appearance-weighted batting age | 18.2 | 18.9 | −0.7 | 56th of 81 |
|
| Plate appearances given to hitters 25 and under | 2430 | 2137 | +292 | 9th of 81 |
|
| Share of plate appearances given to hitters 25 and under | 100.0% | 99.2% | +0.8% | 1st of 81 |
|
| Plate appearances given to hitters 35 and older | 0 | 0 | — | 4th of 81 |
|
Staff shape
| Metric | Value | Lg avg | Diff | Rank | Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pitchers used | 18 | 26 | −8 | 77th of 81 |
|
| Share of innings thrown by starters | 53.4% | 63.4% | −10.0% | 74th of 81 |
|
| Blown saves | 6 | 10 | −4 | 5th of 81 |
|
Results
| Metric | Value | Lg avg | Diff | Rank | Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Run differential | -21 | 0 | −21 | 54th of 81 |
|
| Run differential per game | -0.39 | -0.00 | −0.39 | 55th of 81 |
|
| Runs scored per game | 6.89 | 6.20 | +0.69 | 19th of 81 |
|
| Runs allowed per game | 7.28 | 6.20 | +1.08 | 67th of 81 |
|
| Winning percentage | .519 | .500 | +.019 | 39th of 81 |
|
| Pythagorean winning percentage | .475 | .503 | −.028 | 54th of 81 |
|
| Wins above Pythagorean expectation | 2.4 | -0.2 | +2.6 | 13th of 81 |
|
| Winning percentage in one-run games | .533 | .496 | +.037 | 29th of 81 |
|
| Winning percentage in games decided by five or more | .450 | .500 | −.050 | 53rd of 81 |
|
| Winning percentage in extra innings | 1.000 | .525 | +.475 | 1st of 61 |
|
| Home winning percentage | .630 | .557 | +.073 | 29th of 81 |
|
| Road winning percentage | .407 | .442 | −.036 | 50th of 81 |
|
| Winning percentage within the division | .548 | .501 | +.047 | 36th of 81 |
|
| Longest winning streak | 4 | 5 | −1 | 46th of 81 |
|
Rank is among the Rk clubs with a value for that metric, best first. Descriptive metrics (roster age, WAR concentration) are ranked but not colored — for them, "high" isn't "good".