DSL Arizona Black
D-ARB · Dominican Summer League Dominican Summer League Southwest · 2026Roster construction
| Metric | Value | Lg avg | Diff | Rank | Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hitters used | 18 | 20 | −2 | 38th of 81 |
|
| Plate-appearance-weighted batting age | 18.1 | 18.9 | −0.8 | 60th of 81 |
|
| Plate appearances given to hitters 25 and under | 1758 | 1910 | −152 | 56th of 81 |
|
| Share of plate appearances given to hitters 25 and under | 100.0% | 99.2% | +0.8% | 1st of 81 |
|
| Plate appearances given to hitters 35 and older | 0 | 0 | — | 4th of 81 |
|
Staff shape
| Metric | Value | Lg avg | Diff | Rank | Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pitchers used | 25 | 25 | — | 36th of 81 |
|
| Share of innings thrown by starters | 62.0% | 62.2% | −0.3% | 42nd of 81 |
|
| Blown saves | 7 | 8 | −1 | 20th of 81 |
|
Results
| Metric | Value | Lg avg | Diff | Rank | Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Run differential | 30 | 0 | +30 | 30th of 81 |
|
| Run differential per game | 0.63 | -0.00 | +0.63 | 30th of 81 |
|
| Runs scored per game | 6.04 | 6.22 | −0.18 | 42nd of 81 |
|
| Runs allowed per game | 5.42 | 6.23 | −0.81 | 25th of 81 |
|
| Winning percentage | .563 | .500 | +.063 | 31st of 81 |
|
| Pythagorean winning percentage | .550 | .502 | +.048 | 29th of 81 |
|
| Wins above Pythagorean expectation | 0.6 | -0.1 | +0.7 | 27th of 81 |
|
| Winning percentage in one-run games | .600 | .491 | +.109 | 20th of 81 |
|
| Winning percentage in games decided by five or more | .467 | .503 | −.036 | 51st of 81 |
|
| Winning percentage in extra innings | 1.000 | .533 | +.467 | 1st of 58 |
|
| Home winning percentage | .640 | .560 | +.080 | 24th of 81 |
|
| Road winning percentage | .478 | .439 | +.039 | 36th of 81 |
|
| Winning percentage within the division | .556 | .501 | +.055 | 33rd of 81 |
|
| Longest winning streak | 5 | 5 | — | 26th of 81 |
|
Rank is among the Rk clubs with a value for that metric, best first. Descriptive metrics (roster age, WAR concentration) are ranked but not colored — for them, "high" isn't "good".