Veracruz Rojos
VER · Mexican League Mexican League Hidalgo · 2019Roster construction
| Metric | Value | Lg avg | Diff | Rank | Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hitters used | 17 | 32 | −15 | 44th of 44 |
|
| Plate-appearance-weighted batting age | 30.1 | 28.1 | +2.0 | 8th of 44 |
|
| Plate appearances given to hitters 25 and under | 666 | 1534 | −868 | 36th of 44 |
|
| Share of plate appearances given to hitters 25 and under | 15.7% | 29.4% | −13.7% | 36th of 44 |
|
| Plate appearances given to hitters 35 and older | 558 | 387 | +170 | 15th of 44 |
|
Staff shape
| Metric | Value | Lg avg | Diff | Rank | Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pitchers used | 23 | 32 | −9 | 38th of 44 |
|
| Share of innings thrown by starters | 81.0% | 71.3% | +9.7% | 5th of 44 |
|
| Blown saves | 14 | 19 | −5 | 6th of 44 |
|
Results
| Metric | Value | Lg avg | Diff | Rank | Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Run differential | -92 | 0 | −91 | 37th of 44 |
|
| Run differential per game | -1.18 | -0.01 | −1.17 | 39th of 44 |
|
| Runs scored per game | 5.22 | 5.68 | −0.46 | 29th of 44 |
|
| Runs allowed per game | 6.40 | 5.69 | +0.71 | 35th of 44 |
|
| Winning percentage | .462 | .500 | −.038 | 29th of 44 |
|
| Pythagorean winning percentage | .408 | .500 | −.092 | 38th of 44 |
|
| Wins above Pythagorean expectation | 4.2 | -0.0 | +4.2 | 2nd of 44 |
|
| Winning percentage in one-run games | .478 | .504 | −.026 | 30th of 44 |
|
| Winning percentage in games decided by five or more | .292 | .499 | −.207 | 39th of 44 |
|
| Winning percentage in extra innings | .000 | .507 | −.507 | 43rd of 44 |
|
| Home winning percentage | .524 | .519 | +.005 | 21st of 44 |
|
| Road winning percentage | .389 | .483 | −.094 | 35th of 44 |
|
| Winning percentage within the division | .625 | .506 | +.118 | 5th of 41 |
|
| Longest winning streak | 4 | 5 | −1 | 32nd of 44 |
|
Rank is among the AAA clubs with a value for that metric, best first. Descriptive metrics (roster age, WAR concentration) are ranked but not colored — for them, "high" isn't "good".