Binghamton Rumble Ponies
BNG · Eastern League Eastern League Northeast · 2026Roster construction
| Metric | Value | Lg avg | Diff | Rank | Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hitters used | 34 | 25 | +8 | 2nd of 30 |
|
| Plate-appearance-weighted batting age | 24.3 | 24.3 | — | 16th of 30 |
|
| Plate appearances given to hitters 25 and under | 3701 | 3342 | +358 | 12th of 30 |
|
| Share of plate appearances given to hitters 25 and under | 70.3% | 74.9% | −4.7% | 21st of 30 |
|
| Plate appearances given to hitters 35 and older | 12 | 1 | +10 | 2nd of 30 |
|
Staff shape
| Metric | Value | Lg avg | Diff | Rank | Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pitchers used | 40 | 32 | +7 | 2nd of 30 |
|
| Share of innings thrown by starters | 66.7% | 66.6% | +0.1% | 13th of 30 |
|
| Blown saves | 19 | 19 | — | 13th of 30 |
|
Results
| Metric | Value | Lg avg | Diff | Rank | Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Run differential | -37 | 0 | −37 | 24th of 30 |
|
| Run differential per game | -0.32 | -0.00 | −0.32 | 24th of 30 |
|
| Runs scored per game | 4.67 | 5.22 | −0.55 | 28th of 30 |
|
| Runs allowed per game | 4.99 | 5.22 | −0.23 | 10th of 30 |
|
| Winning percentage | .435 | .500 | −.065 | 26th of 30 |
|
| Pythagorean winning percentage | .470 | .500 | −.030 | 24th of 30 |
|
| Wins above Pythagorean expectation | -4.0 | 0.0 | −4.0 | 25th of 30 |
|
| Winning percentage in one-run games | .438 | .499 | −.061 | 22nd of 30 |
|
| Winning percentage in games decided by five or more | .447 | .498 | −.051 | 23rd of 30 |
|
| Winning percentage in extra innings | .600 | .503 | +.097 | 7th of 30 |
|
| Home winning percentage | .483 | .519 | −.036 | 21st of 30 |
|
| Road winning percentage | .386 | .480 | −.094 | 28th of 30 |
|
| Winning percentage within the division | .506 | .501 | +.005 | 13th of 30 |
|
| Longest winning streak | 10 | 5 | +4 | 1st of 30 |
|
Rank is among the AA clubs with a value for that metric, best first. Descriptive metrics (roster age, WAR concentration) are ranked but not colored — for them, "high" isn't "good".