ACL Padres
A-PAD · Arizona Complex League Arizona Complex League West · 2026Roster construction
| Metric | Value | Lg avg | Diff | Rank | Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hitters used | 23 | 20 | +2 | 20th of 81 |
|
| Plate-appearance-weighted batting age | 20.5 | 18.9 | +1.6 | 8th of 81 |
|
| Plate appearances given to hitters 25 and under | 2048 | 2137 | −89 | 44th of 81 |
|
| Share of plate appearances given to hitters 25 and under | 95.1% | 99.2% | −4.0% | 80th of 81 |
|
| Plate appearances given to hitters 35 and older | 0 | 0 | — | 4th of 81 |
|
Staff shape
| Metric | Value | Lg avg | Diff | Rank | Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pitchers used | 37 | 26 | +10 | 7th of 81 |
|
| Share of innings thrown by starters | 55.7% | 63.4% | −7.7% | 66th of 81 |
|
| Blown saves | 7 | 10 | −3 | 12th of 81 |
|
Results
| Metric | Value | Lg avg | Diff | Rank | Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Run differential | 52 | 0 | +52 | 22nd of 81 |
|
| Run differential per game | 0.87 | -0.00 | +0.87 | 22nd of 81 |
|
| Runs scored per game | 5.63 | 6.20 | −0.57 | 56th of 81 |
|
| Runs allowed per game | 4.77 | 6.20 | −1.43 | 9th of 81 |
|
| Winning percentage | .567 | .500 | +.067 | 28th of 81 |
|
| Pythagorean winning percentage | .576 | .503 | +.073 | 22nd of 81 |
|
| Wins above Pythagorean expectation | -0.6 | -0.2 | −0.4 | 45th of 81 |
|
| Winning percentage in one-run games | .478 | .496 | −.018 | 45th of 81 |
|
| Winning percentage in games decided by five or more | .652 | .500 | +.152 | 21st of 81 |
|
| Winning percentage in extra innings | .667 | .525 | +.142 | 26th of 61 |
|
| Home winning percentage | .633 | .557 | +.076 | 27th of 81 |
|
| Road winning percentage | .500 | .443 | +.057 | 29th of 81 |
|
| Winning percentage within the division | .643 | .501 | +.142 | 16th of 81 |
|
| Longest winning streak | 4 | 5 | −1 | 47th of 81 |
|
Rank is among the Rk clubs with a value for that metric, best first. Descriptive metrics (roster age, WAR concentration) are ranked but not colored — for them, "high" isn't "good".